Last week I participated in the AMGA Ice Intructor Course held mainly in Crawford Notch, NH. The IIC (Ice Instructor Course) is a relatively new program that is now required for guides who wish to complete the Alpine Guide discipline. A 5-day program, the IIC is designed to help guides improve their guiding skills in a winter ice climbing environment.
I must admit that I was initially hesitant about taking the course. In the northeast we’re guiding ice day in and day out all winter long. Why did they have to add such a pricey requirement to the alpine discipline? Can’t they allow guides to test out of the program, at least until the length of the other alpine programs is adjusted to account for this course (they will be shortening the other programs by a few days soon)? After all, it’s hard to take time off from work and pay a lot of money to participate in a program you’re not sure will be worthwhile.
Fortunately, all of my hesitations were dispelled during the course. One week later, looking back at the program, I feel that it is both appropriate and useful for guides of all experience levels who work in an ice environment during the winter. A younger, newer ice guide will be introduced to techniques they can use that will make their experiences easier, safer and more rewarding for their clients. Experienced ice guides will find that the course challenges them to think about how they’ve guided certain routes in the past, and how they can improve upon their current routines.
Most guides generally work in one area and it’s really easy to develop a routine for that area. Routines are generally good for having safe and efficient days in the mountains with clients. However, routines can also lead to complacency; One can get too comfortable if they’re not careful. AMGA courses, like the IIC, and other continuing professional development courses are important because they allow us, as guides, to take a good look at our daily routines and operating procedures. For me the most rewarding aspect of participating in AMGA courses is returning to work afterward with a bigger library of techniques to use and a new outlook on old routines. What can I change about the process? How can I be more efficient? Where have I been putting myself most at risk?I generally feel better about my guiding after participating in programs that force me to be critical of my own daily work routines.
Ok, let’s talk more about the IIC. The AMGA has been trying to fill the IIC with 12 participants. This allows them to have multiple course instructors present during the program. Practical fieldwork implementing course techniques in smaller groups is supplemented by classroom time with together with all of the instructors and participants. Having four different instructors in one place is one of the biggest benefits to the large course size. Each instructor is highly trained but has a slightly different background and different techniques to perform the same process. This helps enforce the idea that there is no set “AMGA protocol”, only good ways of doing things and not so good ways of doing things. Good instructors are a program’s most valuable asset.
The participants were from all over the US and have diverse climbing and guiding backgrounds. Some are well on their way to becoming fully certified IFMGA guides, others are just beginning the process or looking to learn a bit more about guiding/instructing ice. Among the northeastern participants were Kelly Rossiter (Adventure Spirit Guides, Burlington VT), Emilie Drinkwater (Cloudsplitter Mt. Guides, Keene Valley, NY), Doug Ferguson (Mountain Skills, New Paltz, NY), Chuck Boyd (Vertical Realms, Suffield, CT) and Ryan Howes (Atlantic Climbing School and Mooney Mountain Guides).
Over 5 days participants are introduced to techniques useful for guiding ice as well as safety considerations for risk management. Participants are then encouraged to “experiment” with these techniques in an environment with fewer consequences (as compared to an exam or a real day in the field with clients). One difference while working on ice as a guide/instructor is in how to use two ropes so that multiple climbers can both follow simultaneously. There is no set rule about how to do this in an ice environment. Terrain and risk factors(generally speaking, falling ice is the main factor) are the only limitation when implementing different techniques from the Alpine and Rock disciplines. Other discussion topics include technical descending methods, rappel anchors and top managed ice climbing sites.
My general impression of this course is that it was well run and organized. I have the utmost regard for the instructors and feel they are the most valuable asset to any AMGA program. It seems that the AMGA is really doing a good job preparing professional and well-trained guides and that the general public is beginning to realize there is value in hiring an experienced and highly-trained guide. If you’ve taken a Rock Instructor Course I highly recommend this course as a next step for guiding around the northeast.


